Mother demands action: downing street faces pressure over teen’s tiktok death
The mother of a 14-year-old boy who tragically died after a suspected TikTok challenge is intensifying her call for a swift ban on social media for under-16s, accusing the government of dragging its feet on a critical issue.
“Enough delaying tactics” – a mother’s plea
Ellen Roome, speaking on BBC Radio 4’s Today program, delivered a stark message to Downing Street, stating bluntly: “Come on, get a grip, let’s actually stand up, do something, make a decision.” She emphasized her willingness to accept restrictions for adults and children alike, provided immediate action is taken to ensure safety. “Just take it away, fix it, and then we can give it back,” Roome insisted, highlighting the urgent need for a decisive response.
Experts weigh in: tech companies must take responsibility
The debate has drawn in wider commentary. Former Health Secretary Wes Streeting, who previously compared social media to tobacco, argued that tech companies bear the primary responsibility for the harm their platforms inflict. He pointed to a growing body of evidence linking excessive social media use to a range of issues, including sleep deprivation, concentration problems, and mental health challenges. “They know that it is harmful, and the business model is orientated towards getting kids, while they’re young, addicting them with the design features that are designed for addiction to grab your attention and keep you on their platform for as long as possible,” Streeting asserted, advocating for stronger regulatory oversight.
Government response: a measured approach
Labour chair Anna Turley acknowledged the government's consultation period but stressed the need for legislation to keep pace with rapidly evolving technology. “We need to make sure that legislation and protection keeps pace with technology as it changes and protects our children going forward,” she explained. While outlining ongoing plans for measures like age limits on app features – livestreaming, location sharing, and infinite scrolling – Turley defended the government’s cautious approach, citing the potential for circumventing restrictions. “If it’s working for half of children, that’s better than it not working for any children at all,” she conceded.
Australia’s experience: a cautionary tale
The government is considering following the Australian example, which has implemented a ban on social media for under-16s. Streeting highlighted the positive results observed in Australia, noting that the ban has demonstrably reduced harm to children, despite attempts to bypass the restrictions. “If it’s working for half of children, that’s better than it not working for any children at all,” he reiterated, emphasizing the need for proactive measures to protect young people. Ministers are also considering personalized algorithm curbs and mandatory screen curfews. The cost of inaction, Roome makes clear, is simply too high.
A reckoning for tech giants
Ultimately, the responsibility lies with those profiting from these addictive platforms. Until they prioritize safety over engagement, a ban – however regrettable – remains the only viable solution. The clock is ticking.”