Keyboard jamming: workers find ways to skimp on productivity
The quiet hum of the office is under siege. Not by automation, but by a far more insidious form of resistance: keyboard jamming. From police officers to corporate workers, individuals are employing increasingly inventive, and often brazen, methods to feign productivity while coasting through their workday.

The rise of the silent saboteur
The practice, which involves using simple objects to simulate typing activity – a stapler, a strategically placed pen – has exploded in recent months, fueled by the lingering effects of remote work and a growing disillusionment with traditional work structures. It’s a modern echo of ancient workarounds; Diogenes the Cynic, after all, famously rejected employment altogether. But unlike the philosopher’s philosophical stance, this is a calculated deception.
Former Avon and Somerset police officer Liam Reakes is one of the latest examples. He resigned after a review revealed he’d weighed down the 'Z' key for a staggering 103 hours between June and September 2024. His actions are not isolated. Greater Manchester Police alone has identified 28 cases of keyboard jamming in the past three years, according to a Freedom of Information request analyzed by The Times. Detective Niall Thubron, formerly of Durham Police, pressed the 'I' key over 16,000 times in a single day in December 2024 – a performance that cost him his job.
But the ingenuity doesn’t stop there. 'Soft off days,' as some influencers are calling them, represent a more sophisticated approach. These aren’t traditional days off; instead, individuals use AI applications to record meetings, take notes, and draft emails while engaging in leisure activities – cooking, dog-walking, or, more likely, something far less productive. The blurring lines between work and leisure have created an environment ripe for exploitation.
Employers are fighting back. Manchester’s chief constable, Stephen Watson, has banned remote work while the force investigates. The message is clear: Don’t try to hide behind a closed laptop camera. The attempts to game the system are becoming increasingly elaborate, but the response is equally determined. The cost of these distractions— both in terms of lost productivity and compromised integrity— is already substantial.
The real question isn’t how people are faking work, but why the system has become so susceptible to this form of quiet rebellion.
