Our Words Indict Us

What a piece of work is man.”  It takes genius to fully render him, both in time and for all time.

English: Dante Alighieri's portrait by Sandro ...

English: Dante Alighieri’s portrait by Sandro Botticelli. Tempera 54,7 x 47,5 cm. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Trying to verify a phrase and give correct attribution for a piece I was writing, I stumbled on a fabulous critical appreciation from the Sewanee Review by J.T. Barbarese (2009)  of contemporary English translations  of Dante‘s Inferno.  I thought I might share it here for its gems, insights and what it has to say about character development, the inevitable irrevocable choices all people  make in their lives and for an interesting juxtaposition of Shakespeare’s take on character a few hundred years after Dante was no doubt in paradise himself. (We haven’t heard a word from him since).

I also tripped over some fine, thought-provoking references and fresh angles on Milton.  Paradise Lost, go figure.  We haven’t seen the ball since the kick off, it seems.  It’s a perennial subject, paradise; seems like it was here once, but where? And what was it? Hell is much more accessible to us, tangible even, and more convincingly burned into a page than harps, angels, and  the life with wings.

There is too much going on in this essay for me to do justice to it, but I encourage you to sample it at least.  It’s not only great scholarship, but a real enticement to use our heads and re-read the best books with fresh eyes.

A few statements and passages in the essay stopped me in my tracks:

“Shakespeare teaches us that all great art begins in the  stereotypes that individual genius transforms into individual characters.  Shakespeare’s characters’ changes of heart, whether instigated by themselves, God,  destiny, or those occasions that inform against us, are never predetermined.  There is no maturing of a telos already there. What shocks us in Shakespeare,  what shocked Keats into calling it negative  capability, was his agility at getting out of the way of his creations once  the drama was under way. [italics mine]So self-sustaining seems the process of characterization  in Shakespeare, even in his botches (e.g. Titus  Andronicus), that no “real” Shakespeare seems ever to have  existed.”

“We are always  ourselves, right down to the words that speak us into being.”

Dan Brown, a voraciously commercial miner of others’great works and reputations (am I too severe?) is like not to displace this original masterpiece either. His books fade–the real deal endures– and only revive interest in his sources. Thank you, Dan Brown.  You’ll have your own sweet home in one of Dante’s three worlds eventually, but which world only time will tell.

Perhaps, if you’re not a fool for poetry and literary things, you will find the essay a drudge.  If you are inert at this juncture of my intro, you are excused now. But for the rest of us (and our better selves): “Four Translations of Dante’s Inferno,” by J.T. Barbarese, Sewanee Review, Fall 2009–

http://poems.com/special_features/prose/essay_barbarese.php

Posted in Book Reviews, Literature, Rants | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Until the Last Ding Dong of Doom: Faulkner’s Nobel Acceptance Address Still Speaks Volumes to Us as Writers Today

FaulknerLadies and Gentlemen,

I feel that this award was not made to me as a man, but to my work – a life’s work in the agony and sweat of the human spirit, not for glory and least of all for profit, but to create out of the materials of the human spirit something which did not exist before. So this award is only mine in trust. It will not be difficult to find a dedication for the money part of it commensurate with the purpose and significance of its origin. But I would like to do the same with the acclaim too, by using this moment as a pinnacle from which I might be listened to by the young men and women already dedicated to the same anguish and travail, among whom is already that one who will some day stand here where I am standing.

Our tragedy today is a general and universal physical fear so long sustained by now that we can even bear it. There are no longer problems of the spirit. There is only the question: When will I be blown up? Because of this, the young man or woman writing today has forgotten the problems of the human heart in conflict with itself which alone can make good writing because only that is worth writing about, worth the agony and the sweat.

He must learn them again. He must teach himself that the basest of all things is to be afraid; and, teaching himself that, forget it forever, leaving no room in his workshop for anything but the old verities and truths of the heart, the old universal truths lacking which any story is ephemeral and doomed – love and honor and pity and pride and compassion and sacrifice. Until he does so, he labors under a curse. He writes not of love but of lust, of defeats in which nobody loses anything of value, of victories without hope and, worst of all, without pity or compassion. His griefs grieve on no universal bones, leaving no scars. He writes not of the heart but of the glands.

Until he relearns these things, he will write as though he stood among and watched the end of man. I decline to accept the end of man. It is easy enough to say that man is immortal simply because he will endure: that when the last dingdong of doom has clanged and faded from the last worthless rock hanging tideless in the last red and dying evening, that even then there will still be one more sound: that of his puny inexhaustible voice, still talking.

I refuse to accept this. I believe that man will not merely endure: he will prevail. He is immortal, not because he alone among creatures has an inexhaustible voice, but because he has a soul, a spirit capable of compassion and sacrifice and endurance. The poet’s, the writer’s, duty is to write about these things. It is his privilege to help man endure by lifting his heart, by reminding him of the courage and honor and hope and pride and compassion and pity and sacrifice which have been the glory of his past. The poet’s voice need not merely be the record of man, it can be one of the props, the pillars to help him endure and prevail.

From Nobel Lectures, Literature 1901-1967, Editor Horst Frenz, Elsevier Publishing Company, Amsterdam, 1969

[Faulkner revised and expanded this address and used it as a kind of Preface to The Faulkner Reader which was published by Random House in 1953.--ML]

It’s so easy to be a cynic today and the literary world is certainly full of smirking cynics currently, both authors and critics, who would dismiss out of hand the sentiments and convictions Faulkner expressed above.  And yet, re-reading this, I am struck once again by his searing insight into the human condition and our fundamental need for “the old verities.” His advice to writers seems more pertinent and compelling today than ever before.

Posted in Rants | Tagged , , , , | 2 Comments

Quote of the Week via www.WriterzBlox.net ~ May 17th, 2013

Reblogged from WriterzBlox:

Click to visit the original post

“At one time I thought the most important thing was talent. I think now that — the young man or the young woman must possess or teach himself, train himself, in infinite patience, which is to try and to try and to try until it comes right. He must train himself in ruthless intolerance. That is, to throw away anything that is false no matter how much he might love that page or that paragraph.

Read more… 49 more words

[caption id="" align="alignright" width="300"]William Faulkner, 1954 William Faulkner, 1954 (Photo credit: Wikipedia)[/caption] Faulkner, the edifice, the unapproachable, his wholly original body of work. Many have tried to scale it and imitate; all have failed. And yet what a generous, big hearted spirit to have offered the advice in this quote. You can feel the force of his compassion for and understanding of other writers' confusion and struggles  in these words
Posted in Rants | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

A Few Voice Lessons for Young Writers

(c) Copyright 2013, Margaret Langstaff, All Rights Reserved

There is a lot of Hoopdeedoodle (Elmore Leonard’s wonderful term) about the Secret Sacred Writing Mysteries only one click away and readily available to desperate earnest young writers. Publishers have clued into the fact that this is a small but rich book buying “market segment.” These books sell and sell but often fail to deliver on their promises. The reason is most writers of these books haven’t a handle, the merest whisper of a clue, about their ostensible subject. They are parroting something they heard, at the feet of someone else, themselves rigid with awe and respect, which seemed precious and profound, but they never really got it either.

So, anyway, young writers pour over these blanketed with blurbs books, and highlight every third sentence, write resolutions in their journals, fill the books’ margins with notes—and  eventually find themselves back to square one. And yet at some later date they realize they have in fact picked up a thing or two by exposure to these treatises and guides. They note a recurrence of certain terms and phrases. And after some water under the bridge  and even further thought, it becomes apparent to them that everyone they hold in esteem, the horde of MFA instructors, writing coaches, critics, lit gurus and the ilke (I just noticed that rhymes with bilk, I wonder why), as well as all of the books they’ve well-nigh vivisected about writing, seem to think Voice is of utmost importance. Voice?

So why are they still mystified about this, why don’t they understand whatever it is the term refers to, invokes, alludes to, yea bro, what is it about VOICE they just cannot get? When they try to pin the experts down to find out what the heck they are talking about, what an author’s voice is, for starters, they get replies to their questions in the impenetrable language of oracles.

Lo,

Hawthorn

Faulkner

Tolstoy

Melville

Call me Ishmael

And get me a beer while you’re up

This kind of dodge, of course, keeps the meter running and you on the hook.

voice4

Bravely and recklessly, sacrificially, I will offer my own route out of this horrible state, a delirium of doubt and confusion, as a specimen worthy of study.

You can take it from there. I have.

After years and years of reading and study of Literature with a capital L from hell, growing progressively awestruck and stupefied and, as it turned out, paralyzed and sterile, I said, okay, it’s now or never. And I tried to write.

And I found it was a terrible strain, that I was unhappy, and not only with the chore writing was for me, but with what became the results of years of efforts to write something good, all of which everyone found easy to ignore.

Bottom-line: It all was awfully ordinary,

How tragic! What now? thought I. I had to do something, I had acquired certain skills, I realized, in spite of the dismal results qua results in my book, so what the hell could I do with them?

So I wrote other stuff, not creative, but I wrote book reviews, journalism, non-fiction and I wrote books for other people and re-wrote for publishers what they felt were unacceptable manuscripts that had been turned in by marketable hot shots with a following (“platform” to use their word) to whom they had written checks for ridiculously large advances against royalties of said “book.”

Many years passed. I learned more about writing and I learned more about Voice by trying to get into these hotshots’ heads, capture their thoughts, “ideas,” and individual voices in order to get a decent convincingly authentic publishable book for publishers. I was amazed when some of these books appeared on bestseller lists, no one any wiser about the writer who had actually written them.

I also, luck of the draw, I was fortunate to get assignments to interview many, many authors, some of whom I hugely admired. Problem was, for me, that nearly all of those greats or near-greats were, in the presence of the prying press, extremely guarded.

Cover of November 6, 2006.

Cover of November 6, 2006. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Then one day I flew to North Carolina on an assignment for Publishers Weekly magazine, the Time magazine of the book publishing trade/industry. The chief of the Reviews Dept., Sybil Steinberg, at the time—a wonderful, brilliant woman—had become intrigued with one Lawrence Naumoff, the current  golden boy of emergent New Southern Fiction (whatever that was, I thought, okay, I’m in anyway), and she wanted to do a feature on his newest novel, Taller Women.

For me it was a life changing experience. I’d never dreamed you could 1) act like that 2) live like that 3) talk like that and 4) write like that—and get away with it. I never dreamed you could so be yourself and your Self, alone and uncompromised, and attract, mesmerize and entertain an utterly fascinated appreciative audience.

He was wholly original, so odd, strange, so linguistically adept, witty, sly, so subversive to conventional literary numb nuts stuff, well educated, literate and literary, smart, intuitive, personally attractive—all this at once—and so much fun. And—hysterically funny—in spite of having suffered through all the requisite courses and degrees, professorial pontifications and wind-baggery—he escaped without a scrape, unscathed—and everyone who was anyone in the literary world at the time had their antennae up for his next move or burp on page.

This was a new kind of awe for me. It did not diminish; it encouraged; it lifted me up as a writer.

He picked me up at the Raleigh airport in the funniest worst rattle trap rusty truck and I stared in wonderment at the blacktop road flying by two feet away from my feet (no floor whatsoever in the thing on the passenger’s side) as we alternately sped, wandered, streaked, stuttered and toodled our way back to his home for lunch.

The interview I eventually wrote for PW that came out of what has to be one of the most entertaining, eye-opening experiences of my life, is anthologized in an annual Pushcart Press puts out, Writing for Your Life #2: Fifty Outstanding Writers Talk About the Art of Writing and the Job of Publishing. It was edited, of course, according to PW’s particular slant and angle and does not tell half the story. But it might be worth your while to read it. (I get no royalties from it that way, but the royalties I get from that single afternoon continue to accrue and enrich and confirm my life.)

After that encounter with a real original, an authentic voice, a voice in which I instantly recognized some of my own voice, my own tones and attitudes, I finally got it and I got a whole lot more. Somehow, when Lawrence spoke, I could see and hear myself seeing and saying almost the same things in nearly the same kind of way. It was very weird. He was kind of like me! He was a relative or something, literarily, to me. I could get into his skin somewhat, especially the teasing humorous irreverence, his tall tales that stood the tall tales of convention on their heads (i.e., Taller Women, his new book). It was as if I had found a long lost brother. I was all at once shocked, amazed, delighted, and affrighted. I did not know how to even to begin to process the shocks of recognition I experienced. But in net result it was exhilarating, liberating, inebriating. I stopped worrying, I didn’t care anymore, I realized that if he could do that, hell’s bells, so could I! What’s more, I came to grips with the truth that if I was going to be any genuine writer at all I would have to be myself first. Fearlessly.

Even so, easier said than done. I started writing fiction again and I wrote several books I thought people would want to read. This too was a strain, I did not enjoy it and I’m still not satisfied with them, although some have sold fairly well. Finally, one day I resolved to write books that I wanted to read in a style that was real, comfortable and amusing to me. For me, I found a good story or a book all started with  interesting characters in a certain situation and I wanted to see what they would do, what would happen next.

That’s when, after so many years, I found my own—for better or worse—voice. Writing then became a breeze, words came crowding, ideas burgeoned, my imagination had been sprung from its cage and it was off to the races.

I would have to say that when you find yourself in a similar state, you can be certain you have then found your voice as a writer. Never mind the Lo and Beholders you cow towed to in the past, never look back at the guides and instructors. Never look back.

Mind you, these are no tickets to fame, bestseller-dumb or fortune. One thing a writer with literary aspirations has to understand and accept is that the readership for even the greatest book ever will always be small in an author’s lifetime, and however glowing the critical notice one of your books gets, sales will quickly slump and you and the book that took you a year or many years to write will become yesterday’s news in a matter of months. Or less.

If you can deal with that, and the arduous process required to produce such books, then you will probably make it and be satisfied with such a life. Truth is, most can’t and I don’t think any less of them for it. I understand.

 

Posted in Literature, Rants, writing | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Some Telling Truths about Truth Itself by Authors Who Were or Are Intent on Telling the Truth

This is a thorny issue, and dangerous under the best of circumstances. But it is an inescapable one, an ongoing lifelong challenge, for serious writers.  So many acceptable dodges, evasions, even escapes, are handily available, and it’s far easier to bow to the pressure of convention, knuckle under, than hold one’s own feet to the fire and thus invite an auto da fe, offering one’s self and work as the main event, and  providing even the spark and kindling for it in the process.

Just throwing the following out as a small plate of hot  tapas of truth as possibly inflammatory statements that may  spark or stimulate those writers in need of a fire in the belly, a recognition of risks in writing books in which a truth or truth inheres, a re-kindling of their resolve and commitment,  and a re-ignition of their imaginations to stick with this hot potato at the heart of all great books, something everyone would rather not handle and tries to always quickly hand off,  in all of its difficulties and hazards.

“The truth is always something that is told, not something that is known. If there were no speaking or writing, there would be no truth about anything. There would only be what is.”
Susan Sontag, The Benefactor

There is no doubt fiction makes a better job of the truth.”
Doris Lessing, Under My Skin

“An unbelieved truth can hurt a man much more than a lie. It takes great courage to back truth unacceptable to our times. There’s a punishment for it, and it’s usually crucifixion.”

John Steinbeck, East of Eden

“I am suspicious of all the things that the average person believes.”
H.L. Mencken

“No one tells the truth to people they don’t actually know, and if they do it is a horrible trait. Everyone wants something smaller, something neater than the truth.”

Ann Patchett, State of Wonder

Finally some rather direct direction to writers from Emily Dickinson, a poet I know well, and  one who is not, shall we  say, renowned for being explicit about anything ( i.e., calling a spade a spade?), but for her allusiveness  and deft use of ambiguity:

“Tell all the Truth but tell it slant–

Success in Circuit lies.

Too bright for our infirm Delight

The Truth’s supreme surprise

As Lightning to the Children’s eased

With explanation kind

The truth must dazzle gradually

Or every man be blind–”

Not to mention the fact that nobody would  like you, so much as talk to you or ever read your books, eh Emily?

I would also add to the above that if you do in fact tell a needful truth as a writer, and do it artfully, some people will respect and laud you, shout your name from the roof tops, even thank you and some will hate you, really hate you, and try to hurt you and defile your work. So expect that and ignore it when it happens.  It means you are onto something, closing in on them (the liars), yes, it does. It means what you’ve written threatens them and they are frightened. Otherwise they’d ignore you and you’d be a placid ineffectual scribbler alone in a corner. And that’s the truth–tonight– according to Margaret Langstaff :)

Posted in Rants | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

You Have to Be Willing to Make a Fool Out of Yourself: Some Advice to a Young Writer

Office Worker with Mountain of Paperwork

(c)Copyright 2013 Margaret Langstaff, All Rights Reserved

I receive many emails and questions from young writers of fiction, serious novices who have literary aspirations. Many of them are well read and well educated and as a result are so in awe of the masters and their great books that they are almost crippled as beginning writers themselves. The reverence they have for these highly polished masterpieces is not informed by an understanding of the writing process because they do not yet understand the creative process; they are not aware of the ardor, angst, despair, the inevitable blunders hacked out and abandoned, the blizzard of reviled drafts that pile up, the monstrous revisions and seemingly endless re-writes required and the sometimes tedious re-sculpting/re-shaping that produce truly wonderful timeless literary books. They write two chapters of what they hope will be their first book and they want literary advice and critique! They find it difficult to continue unless and until they receive a nod of encouragement or reassurance that they are not wasting their time or moving in the wrong direction.

While I certainly do not place myself or work in any literary pantheon, no seasoned writer in his or her right mind would do that, I do indeed at this stage of my life and career understand what it takes to write books worth reading. I have interviewed for magazines and newspapers, over the years, a number of the luminaries of contemporary fiction and poetry, and I have written, I believe, enough books, both under my own name and for others, have evaluated sufficient manuscripts for publishers and read and reviewed more than enough contemporary fiction for media, in order to have somewhat of a handle on these matters.

Great books begin, to borrow Yeats’ metaphor, “in the foul rag and bone shop of the heart” and in an uncritical indulgence, initially, of the writer’s imagination. They begin as inspired messes that arise from the unconscious. The sense and sensibility that comes to inhere in them finally is achieved by revision, re-drafting, re-structuring and editing, late stage activities that require a cooler, more rational approach and another set of skills entirely.

If you try to do both activities at once, a common mistake of those with literary aspirations in their first efforts, you will hoist yourself on your own petard and not get anywhere. They are neither compatible nor simultaneous activities. They are sequential. They are stages in the process.

As I often find myself repeating more less the same thing, I thought it might be helpful to some who visit here to cut and paste the following from a note I wrote recently in reply to a few earnest, anguished questions from a young writer at the impasse I just described. We had corresponded many times previously and I had grown a bit exasperated in trying to get him to “get it.”  My reply was written quickly, could have been revised and edited and thus improved, but I have more pressing work to do, so I will just post it here as is. This is a blog post, not a book, and in that regard, tonight “I have miles to go before I sleep.” It will just have to serve as follows, if it serves at all.

[Incidentally, the recipient is in the thrall of Joyce, pen paralyzed, his imagination frozen stiff.]

 You are thinking way too hard about this and taking yourself way too seriously. You haven’t written an entire book yet, from start
to finish, have you? Until you write a few or a dozen, you have no idea what is involved, how to do it, what makes for a great one. Do you really think Joyce decided critically and analytically beforehand how to write ULYSSES or FINNEGAN’S WAKE? Or even what they would ultimately “be about?” God, no! He may have had an idea, or be following the scent of an idea, but more likely he had a person in mind, probably a composite or montage of real flesh and blood people he knew, and he heard their voices in his head, he knew the amalgamated character of the polyglot individual lives, and he tunneled in from that point, he piped into what was going on in the interior of the character, his thoughts, feelings, whims, visceral reactions and his transient thoughts and impressions. He felt it, listened, and watched. The flood of it caught him up and carried him along. He became a mimic, a recorder, a reporter of it all. He just sat down and let it happen, whatever happened. ONLY THEN, after he had, did he go back and analyze what he had written about it. ONLY THEN did he ask himself: was it an accurate representation, did it have any coherence or truth, did it mean anything organically, was it worth anyone else’s while to be bothered by it, could he present it to another reader’s eyes in a way that would connect, ring true? If not, how might it be re-shaped, recast, re-phrased, honed and improved to do this? 

You have got the cart before the horse. It may be you would be more at home writing non-fiction, an activity to which your almost reflexive insistence on rationality would be more of a help. Human behavior is largely irrational, is based on feelings and emotions. I presume you hope your fictional characters will render human experience?

As it is, you are suffocating your imagination, your best resource. Nothing is death to originality and truly inspired fiction like self-censorship, apprehension of the result, fear of failure. You are going to fall short and fail. Expect that and get over it. You are going to despise and wring your hands over, lose all hope over, much of what you write. All great writers have thousands of pages of abandoned false starts, false leads, and characters. Why do you think you will be any different? If you are unwilling to take the time and risks involved in the evolution and development of a novelist worth reading, you will never make it. You have to be willing to write reams of dreck on the remote chance you will write your way out of the morass all beginning writers start in and at last write something really good, worth notice.

You have to be willing to make a fool out of yourself. For you will sometimes, you can count on that, but you have to have the resolution and commitment to keep at it nevertheless, for if you do and you have talent, you will acquire what you need by failing, understanding and correcting the mistakes you made, making you progressively more fit and competent to write something rich, original and compelling—something that might even last.

Posted in Literature, Rants | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

"When I have Fears that I may Cease to be" by John Keats (read by Tom O'Bedlam)

Reblogged from Learnalltheway:

  • Click to visit the original post

When I have Fears That I May Cease to Be

BY JOHN KEATS

When I have fears that I may cease to be

   Before my pen has gleaned my teeming brain,

Before high-pilèd books, in charactery,

   Hold like rich garners the full ripened grain;

When I behold, upon the night’s starred face,

   Huge cloudy symbols of a high romance,

And think that I may never live to trace…

Read more… 112 more words

A perdurable poet and poem. Rare and wonderful.
Posted in Book Reviews, Literature, Rants | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment